hindu holoucast

it was mainly a hindu thing, like holocaust was mainly a jewish thing (despite the fact that hitler end gypsies and slavs too).

perspective: the brits were busy converting the hindus into kirastanism with their vile missionaries to render india servile to brits. the idea behind conversion is one and only one: to make india a servile nation that will do the bidding of brits without questioning - like australia and canada send their troops for every british war, and call brit queen their queen. truly enough, the converted kirastanis were full supporters of brit colonialist babarians (barbarians is superfluous word). not surprisingly, therefore, in the 1857 war of indepndence, which brits call a mutiny, the hindus end all the indian xtian converts, for they were seen as collaborators of colonial barbarians. (like chorchil sank the disobedient french warship in ww2). you may also note that in the long history of indian freedom fight the kirastanis were loyal to brits or didn't care.

and kirastanis still don't care: in modern india, the kirastanis still look to europeans as allies against the hindus despite the fact that hindus give them not only full rights but (foolishly) subsidize their churches. the kirastanis therefore invite european missionaries by planeloads into india to convert the poor hindus, fully aware that this makes hindus very mad. they continue to berate hindu organizations or leaders and mistreat them every opportunity thay get. kirastanis have yet to show in their 2006 year history that they can be hindu-friendly people, and won't be unless they come to the realization that they were-are being duped just like the most of the modern day europeans have come to realize it, and keep safe distance from church. you won't find euros enthused about jesus like the indian converts are. isn't it a huge turn-off when you see indian kirastanis giving sermons in european churches because europeans rather worship sun on sunday mornings than be in church?

did