fasgnadh
Speaking of discredited, Howard didn't mention 'personal heroes' at all, did he?
Must be why you're too scared to answer questions
So, was Howard's talk about his personal heroes, or not?
No, I can just think for myself, and I'm able to answer questions. Something you're not capable of, it seems.
Nobody was, just you.
Howard's talk was about geopolitics, you idiot, and that's what you're criticising him about.
Tell that to the Argentinians, the Soviets and Saddam.
Guess you can't deal with the fact that Reagan crushed communism in Europe
So answer this question: what was howard's speech about? (Hint, it wasn't his personal heroes)
.....and you can't even get the topic of Howard's talk right, instead you pretend it was about something else.
You're changing the topic, as you usually do when you can't answer an argument
This from the guy who always changes topic when he can't counter an argument
BTW, where does he "support torture"?
LOL. Jesus, not only can't you answer questions relating to the topic, now you're talking about the American republican party. You need to cange your meds, fagbags
Awww, that's nice. What's that got to do with you lying about the topic of Howard's speech?
Awww, that's nice. What's that got to do with you lying about the topic of Howard's speech?
Heh. As usual, when you can't refute a point, you resort to non-sequiturs
So, you're criticising Howard for meeting the PM of a country you've expressed your admiration for. You seem more than a little confused fagbags...
LOL. Didn't even try to refute the point I see: that you're a hypocrite who blathers about "torture" and "human rights", yet you admire the brutal Vietnamese regime.
So, was Howard's speech about his personal heroes and great Australians? Yes or no?
So, was Howard's speech about his personal heroes and great Australians? Yes or no? You really need to get back on your schitzoid meds
LOL. It was you who invented a phony topic in the first place, pretending Howard's speech was about his personal heros and great Australians. Then you start screeching about the US republicans. Are you actually capable of following a topic?
Speaking of "changing topic", was Howard's speech about his personal heroes and great Australians? Yes or no?
LOL, the one you admire. Great consistent morals you have there, Fagbags
Then why did the soviets say this is what happened?
No, I'm asking why Weary Dunlop is somehow related to a speech on geopolitics and communism.
Was Howard's speech about his personal heroes, or not? Yes or no?
Which have what to do with Howard's speech? This simple question seems beyond you.
Pregnant girls smokeless labour painPregnant girls smoke-less labour pain All 2 messages in topic - view as tree - 1 new Groups: uk.politics.misc Not yet rated Rating: show options Reply Reply to Author Forward Print Individual Message Show...
LOL, let's see....
"Vale Ho Chi Minh, a great national leader." - Fasgnadh, Apr 30 2005
What a shameless hypocrie you are.
Hey, at least he never called mbutt-liquidateing totalitarian psycho Hi Chi Minh a "great national leader"