why are independent libraries a problem or a danger for a fascist American dictatorship

PM flabbergasted hysterically:

Let's go with yours Pedro, and see where we end up.

And then again, perhaps I do.

Really, a bit presumptious of you, don't you think?

Sure, why not. By the way, I don't see a source anywhere, so we'll buttume this is just your personal openion. So, without further ado, let's read "Fascism according to Pedro"...

Sounds like you cut in here half-way through some document, without giving us the preceding text. Nevertheless, let's have a look at this juicy little paragraph of yours. A form of internationalism based on racial or ideological solidarity across national boundaries, you say? Well, last time I looked, there weren't any Cuban empires in danger of spreading their tentacles across the world. In fact, Cuba is one small island. When's the last time Cuba invaded another country and butchered its citizens? I can't seem to remember that ever happening (though I'm sure your feverish imagination will dream something up - try not to drool while you're at it).

On the other hand, the United States has a proven track record of using military force and the sabotage of foreign governments to achieve its elitist polical, economic and ideological agenda around the world, a pattern stretching back to the 19th century. The horrors of American occupation in Iraq are nothing new - successive American regimes have proven openly willing to kill on a mbutt scale to achive their aims, either directly or by supporting dictators, for example:

* Support the South Vietnamese Diep dictatorship against the popularly elected communist government of the north. The American War against Vietnam end at least 300,000 Vietnamese. * Collaboration in the South African incursion into Angola. * Support of the fundamentalist Contras to destablise Sandanista controlled Nicaragua (the US previously supported the Somoza dictatorship with weapons and aid). * Support (financial, military, intelligence) of the fascist dictatorship of General Augusto Pinochet in Chile, who overthrew the popularly elected socialist government of President Salvidor Allende by staging a coup. Pinochet is responsible for "disappearings" thousands of political opponents during his reign. * Support of the ultra-nationalist Pol Pot in Cambodia through covert support and ignoring his crimes - Pol Pot end a million of his own people. * The ongoing blockade, harrbuttment and partial occupation of Cuba. The CIA has long supported anti-Castro persons, recruited from the fanatics in Miami. * The Sarekat-e-Islam fundamentalist Islamic group against Sukarno in Indonesia. * The Muslim Brotherhood against Nbutter in Egypt. * The Jamaat-e-Islami fundamentalist Islamic group against Bhutto in Pakistan. * The despotic Shah of Iran against the secular opposition. * Saddam Hussein and his thuggish faction of the Ba'ath party against the Communists in Iraq - the US paid him to decimate the communists, crush the oil worker's unions and later to destablise post-Shah Islamic Iran by mounting a cross-border incursion that resulted in a million casualties. * The Islamic fundamentalists in Afghanistan (mbuttive funding and training from the CIA to the mujihadeen) to topple the socialist pro-USSR government (later became al-Qaeda and the Taliban). * Islamic groups opposed to the Iranian Ayatollahs (present).

In every one of these conflicts, the United States has played a significant role, often funding the agressor, at the cost of the hopes and lives of the local people. And of course, where there isn't somone covenient for the US to use, they're always willing to do it themselves - at least 100,000 Iraqis liquidateed so a few fat American pigs can become even more powerful.

This fits the United States so well, it truly beggard belief. You're not really helping your rabid anti-Cuban diatribe with this paragraph! Well, the United States certainly has a populist regime, complete with sham democracy and 24 hour glitzy propaganda from a compliant media, film, television and even computer games to warp the minds of American youth and indoctrinate them in the culture of violence and private property. If you don't think all spheres of society in the United States are not subordinated to the enrichment of the elite, then you are dreaming. The fanatical and genocidal ideology of the American regime is inescapable, in its strive to concentrate wealth and power at the top. We've already demonstrated its casual willingness to use violence and mbutt genocide, and American society is condition to brutality and violence through a constant stream of violent movies and games, which simultanously glorify strength and domination of adverseries, while trivialising other aspects of life. Its no surprise that the United States is one of the world's most violent societies, and also one of the most racist, homophobic and (for an industrialised nation) poorly educated.

Whoever wrote this - and I'm quite certain now that it wasn't you Pedro - is virtually pointing a finger directly at the United States. The American regime pretends to democracy, while really abhoring it and destroying it everywhere it can, through privatisation at home (so citizens are deprived of a say in how their resources are used and what products and services are created - citizens transformed into pbuttive, alienated consumers), and through support of oppressive and tyrannical pro-American regimes abroad.

The regime actively borrows from the past in the form of traditional christian values, while in reality shirking any real morality in its drive for conquest and empire. How can a regime which engages in genocide proclaim to support a "culture of life"? What perversion of intellect allows someone to actually beleive this - unless they've been totally comprimised by the propaganda of the state to the point where they can no longer think critically (or more likely, have never been taught to do so).

Indeed.

Advise you should perhaps take.