But Chika Honda is innocent?
You didn't meticulously do anything except prove that you're incredibly inconsistent.
But of course you believe Hoda is innocent whereas Corby is guilty.
You forgot: Both were human Both had on occasion watched TV Both had breathed oxygen Both had drunk water Both had been born
Really, the "similarities" between the two cases could be applied to virtually anybody.
Bali the holiday from Hell 156So what does that make you. Did you come aloveualy SO what are you tring to say thay they both used a method of packaging. Hey here are some news, some strap...
AND: Corby's bag contained a boogey board Honda's bag contained clothing and other items Corby's bag was unlocked Honda's bag was locked The drugs in Corby's bag were visible immediately upon opening of the bag The drugs in Honda's bag were hidden behind panels in secret compartments There's probably 100 other differences that can be applied.
Actually, based on the evidence presented in both cases I believe Corby is not guilty and Honda is guilty. Are you claiming there was no evidence presented in Honda's case that showed her guilt? That's denial, which just happenes to be one of the traits of a conspiracy theorist like yourself.
Who's to say Corby's case won't? Anything can make it to the UN.
I don't need to put words into your mouth. You do a good enough job of showing how stupid you are without anyone's help.
Bali the holiday from Hell 157Never said that at all. You are the one bleating so much that Corby is innocent with futile evidence the justice system of Indonesia is so...