You don't know that she is innocent any more than I could prove that she is guilty but where you compared the evidence to her motive not to mention to suspectable history, she is not all that innocent either.
So you are willing to believe a convicted felon. The prisons are full of "innocent" people oh plleeabutte so why is he coming up when he should have a long time ago. Do you think that the Indonesian authorities will allow video conferencing where they are unable to obtain the so called real trafficker.
Remember the first one who have a nice holiday to Bali? his evidence was that he overheard a conversation. That was the real evidence.
Bali the holiday from Hell 699But Chika Honda is innocent? You didn't meticulously do anything except prove that you're incredibly inconsistent. But of course you believe Hoda is innocent whereas Corby...
Firstly why is he demanding immunity. The offence happened in Indonesia despite what their intentions and if they knew what could happen, they should have no immunity at all. It sounds like he is more likely bullpooting than telling the truth.
Secondly, It is an Australian airlines flight and there is no drop off pbuttengers at Sydney Airport International terminal from Brisbane so baggage handlers at Brisbane would have known that and the baggage in question would remain in the locked containers at the cargo bay.
So refute the clear evidence of baggage labels on bags contain the total weight of check in luggage and all she had to do is to weight the total luggage and if it was domestic smuggling the weight would have been offsetted by the weight of the drugs. Please explain as to why her defence team could not weigh the luggage and went for the "reasonable doubt" strategy like ordinary criminals does?
