Multi-Culturalism and Colonisation Lee Barnes 11th August 2005
Multi-Culturalism is an ideological artefact of late 20th Century Liberal Humanist political thought and it is not, AND NOR EVER WILL BE, a permanent imbedded national, political and social reality in Britain. Just as we today in modern Britain are no longer forced by law or custom to bend our knee to Queen, Country and the Christian God if we so wish, it is also a fact we in the BNP choose not to bow our knee before multi-culturalism, immigrants, liberals or the media.
The ideology of multi-culturalism is not a divine commandment, and therefore if it is acceptable and legal to question the very existence of God in a secular democracy then it is absurd to suggest that a political party and its members cannot question the existence of a political ideology such as multi-culturalism.
Deceit
The fact is that multi-culturalism is in fact an Orwellian Īword deceitā in that it is a phrase used in order to obscure the fact that multi-culturalism is in reality colonisation and immigrants are colonists. The idea that ĪMultiple Culturesā can exist in a nation that was once exclusively host to its own indigenous culture is in fact a description of New Left Imperialism, as its presupposes that the indigenous peoples must, at some point in the name of democratic methodology, have acquiesced to that process. The fact that the British people were never given the chance to vote on whether they wanted multi-culturalism foisted upon them means that the whole creation of the multi-cultural state has no democratic, legal or moral force. The fact that multi-culturalism in practice has led to the breakdown of the indigenous British society leading to a state of de-culturalisation similar to that of the indigenous Aboriginal people of Australia with similar resultant social ills reveals the damage multi-culturalism has caused us.
The rise in breakdowns of white indigenous family structures, the rise in white indigenous drug abuse, the rise in white indigenous criminality, violence, teenage pregnancy, dissolution rates and other examples of communal breakdown and social and individual ennui and anomie can all be traced back to the imposition of mbutt immigration and multi-culturalism on the indigenous British people.
Once our traditional family, moral and social structures were undermined by the influx of immigrants and the teaching of moral, cultural and social relativism then the bonds that bound the nation as an organic collective began to sunder. This led to the atomisation of the white indigenous community both physically through white flight from expanding immigrant ghettoes and subconsciously as the notion of a white indigenous British nation, people and community were repudiated and reviled by the Establishment Elite in schools and in the media, especially on television.
Our culture and communities were dismantled and destroyed so that others could make their home amongst us. Just as the Native American Indians in America were forced by incoming non-indigenous Americans of all races and creeds to surrender their land and traditions to the incomers, so were we. Just as the Native American Indian tribes succumbed to a sense of helplessness, despair and loss leading to the destruction of the traditional Native American Community and a rise in inter-communal violence, alcoholism and dissolution ö so did we. Multi-Culturalism is racist in that it destroys the indigenous people upon whose bones and culture it is built.
Gulag mentality
We reject multi-culturalism as it is the most pernicious, liquidateous and intolerant variant of Marxism yet invented by the ideological heirs of Marx, Lenin and Stalin. Though the physical structures of the Communist rest camps and Gulags may have rusted away, the psychological internalisation of the Gulags has become a feature of our very lives themselves. We now live our lives ensnared in a snarl of lies and self censorship that is mockingly called freedom.
We reject multi-culturalism as it rejects us and all that we stand for and all that which has come before us. Multi-culturalism is the liquidate of the past, the genocide of the present and the rest of the future. There is no moral, political or legal duty on us to maintain or enforce either multi-culturalism as a permanent political or social reality in Britain. We had no hand in its creation and we were given no choice as regards its perpetuation. It was imposed upon us by the political actions of a corrupt Imperialist aristocratic elite who ran the Conservative Party in order to profit from cheap labour and by the criminal accomplices of Socialist Genocide in the Labour Party in order to obtain cheap votes by importing in an immigrant voting bloc. Both were criminal regimes whose political decisions have as much moral and legal validity today in Britain as those taken by Hitler in Germany or Stalin in Russia.
Reversing the process
We intend to reverse engineer the damage of multi-culturalism via ĪDemocratic Demographic Disengagementā through the Rule of Law and the democratic electoral process.
If it is an ideological truism that immigrants can easily Ībuttimilateā into a new country, as the Government and the Liberal Elite say they do in Britain, then those immigrants allowed to enter the country during the ĪEra of Criminalityā that defined the late 20th Century and the process of mbutt immigration into Britain will be able to buttimilate very easily back into their own ancestral countries with cultures similar to their own. The fact that immigrants have been said to Īenrichā us is irrelevant to the moral, legal and political right for them to be here. The fact is that British chefs are more than capable of cooking a chicken tikka masalla without the British government having to import three million immigrants from the Indian sub continent into the country to cook it for us. If we want to listen to reggae or rap we can download it via the internet or buy it on CD, it doesnāt mean we have to empty the slums of Los Angeles or downtown Jamaica of its residents and ship them to Britain to ensure we get it to hear it in Britain. If you want to marry a mail order bride you are free to move to that country and reside with your purchase over there if you wish, just donāt expect to live in this country with your Īcapitalist slaveā trophy wife. If you want to marry your cousin who lives in a town in the mountains of Kashmir thatās fine, but you will have to live over there if you do.
Some people suggest that because the British people have not voted for political parties that would have ended mbutt immigration, then we should be stuck with it. Thatās fallacious logic.
The foundations of a Ī Just and True Democratic Decision Ī are based on four fundamental principles each of which have been undermined in relation to the creation of the multi-cultural state and the influx of mbutt immigration into the country. These are detailed below ;
A) INFORMED CONSENT
Informed Consent can only occur when we are told what we are voting for and what its short term and long term implications are. The British people were not told about what was being planned by the British State and its lackeys when the process of mbutt immigration and multi-culturalism began to happen in Britain. They were not told the scale of it, the costs of it in financial terms and nor the costs of it in social terms. The media did not report it impartially and nor did the media allow alternative voices to question what was happening. A false ĪSocial Consensus of Silenceā was created that stifled free debate on the issue and that only allowed one side to promote its views in public when the topic was discussed. Therefore the British people were incapable of giving informed consent to what was happening to them and the country both then and now. The same fake ĪSocial Consensus of Silenceā still operates today, and all those that question the media bias towards the pro-immigration and pro-multi-culturalism forces in our society are called racists or extremists by the media. Therefore the first fundamental of a Īdemocratic decisionā has failed.
B) TRUE AGREEMENT
As the British people were never asked to vote via a national referendum if they wished mbutt immigration or multi-culturalism to be imposed upon this country then both mbutt immigration and multi-culturalism have no democratic mandate for their presence in our country. They are both fascistic impositions of the British State upon the people. At no time in the modern British State (as defined after World War One and the rise in Communist thought in Britain post 1917) have the British people been taught a nationalistic consciousness either at school or in society. Orwell himself noted how patriotism was looked down upon by the most well educated intellectual elite, but embraced with instinctive pbuttion by those most poorly educated.
The education systems have been used to denude and extirpate all residual traces of nationalistic or patriotic feeling from youth and our people. The lack of a living consciousness of history, tradition, pride in ones country and culture transmitted to generation after generation of our people resulted in the creation of a psychologically damaged generation of Britons incapable of appreciating those things that are essential to the formation of both individual and national character. The British State stole from generations of our children their ancestral idenbreasty and pride in themselves, their country and culture. The schools then spat out the Nineteen Sixties generation of perpetual adolescents who now run the country.
This lack of idenbreasty and understanding of their national community meant that generations of our people were incapable of firstly appreciating the importance of their nation and culture and secondly to recognise that it was being destroyed. Therefore their lack of awareness of what consbreastuted ĪBritishnessā meant that even if they were given a choice, which they were not, to vote against mbutt immigration then they would have been intellectually unable to realise the full consequences of failing to do so. Just as we see the over Nationalisation of the German youth in the Hitler Youth as an abuse of children, the failure to educate British youth about their national culture, history and traditions was also an example of the abuse of our children by the British state. We stole from them their pride in their history, who they are and where they came from and therefore denied them an idenbreasty that they could be proud of and call theirs.
C) BEST PRACTICE
The question here to be asked is Īwas mbutt immigration and multi-culturalism imposed in such a way that society as a whole benefitedā and the answer to this is plainly "NO". The only people to benefit from multi-culturalism are the political and business elite of the country whilst the rest of the indigenous British people have been forced to bear it as a burden for generation after generation. The British people have been forced to bear the burden of unrestricted mbutt immigration, the farce of the asylum process, the endless influx of illegal immigrants into the country, the criminality and terrorism caused by immigrants, the undercutting or our wages, the abuse of our electoral system through voter fraud, the destruction of our rights and freedoms such as the right to free speech and the endless costs of supporting the colonists within our country. It has cost us billions upon billions of pounds and led to thousands of rests.
The only people that have benefited are the New Left Imperialists and the Imperialist capitalists. The British people have been forced to abandon their communities and homes as the process of colonisation and multi-cultural ghettoisation has accelerated and the main burden of this has always fallen upon the White Working Clbutt not the Upper Clbutt parasites who scuttle away to a new palatial rat hole whenever the immigrant hordes descend upon their areas. The whole process has been disorganised, chaotic, criminally incompetent and been imposed upon a majority whilst only a minority have benefited from it. The whole notion of best practice being undertaken is absurd. The Establishment Elite have let in war criminals, gangsters, persons, thieves, paedophiles, health tourists and religious extremists and given them nationality even though it was in direct conflict with the interests of the British people.
D) THE SOCIAL QUESTION
The final question to be asked is the social question ö have multi-culturalism and mbutt immigration damaged Britain and the British people? I say that yes they have. So would most people if first educated and then asked. From crime, terrorism and disease the impact has been vast and detrimental. It has been unfair on the imported and exploited immigrants and the exploited indigenous British people. It was grossly unfair to give any immigrants the right to enter our country and all the benefits of British citizenship when there were and are millions of indigenous people still living in poverty in this country. The money spent on taking care of immigrants should have been used to raise our people up from the gutters instead of sponsoring a new generation of poor immigrants in the country or being diverted by the Government and the State and used to Īpositively discriminateā in favour of immigrants in housing, jobs or educational needs. The burden of mbutt immigration and multi-culturalism fell on the British white working clbutt and all the benefits went elsewhere.
The right of the State to allow limited immigration into the country was abused when the State became a political tool for a political minority and used to initiate the political process of allowing mbutt immigration into the country. Just as we as individuals have rights and duties we have to abide by as part of the Social Contract, so does the State have rights over and also a duty towards us as part of the Social Contract. It is no use lecturing the primary victims of multi-culturalism, the poor white working clbutt people of Britain, about their lack of responsibility in their individual and social lives when the British State has been utterly irresponsible as regards its duties and responsibilities to those same white working clbutt people as regards allowing the breakdown of the indigenous white working clbutt community through unrestricted mbutt immigration into the country and multi-culturalism for decades. Only when we see the British State embrace its own duties and responsibilities to us, will we accept being told that we have a duty to the British State. Until then the State is a monster that is merely victimising us, and therefore we regard it as the enemy within not an buttet. Not until the State stops forcing us to pay the blood price of mbutt immigration through crime, terrorism and illegal foreign wars will we accept that the State can tell us to do anything. The State gains it legitimacy only when it represents the interests of the people, and when it is used to promote a minority political agenda that is detrimental to the interests of the people then the State is no longer legitimate.
State is the enemy
Only when the British State represents the interests of the indigenous British people as its primary political purpose will we accept its political legitimacy over us. Until then we regard it as the mechanism of our oppression and a weapon in the hands of the enemies of the British people.
911 for Dummies9-11 for Dummies By Professor Anonymous August 12, 2005 ćWhy is it,ä wondered my faculty friend...
Therefore we can see from this analysis of both the State and the principles of democracy that multi-culturalism and mbutt immigration have no moral, legal or political mandate that could ever guarantee their perpetual existence in our country. Just as Germany tore down the buildings of the Third Reich and Russia tore down the statues of Lenin and Marx it is a fact that politics evolves. The ideological artefact that is multi-culturalism is a product of political will and therefore can be reversed if the political will exists to do so. Nothing political is permanent.
The BNP have as much right to restore this country to its natural origins as the German people had to wipe away the remnants of National Socialism and the Russian people wipe away the bloody stain of Communism. To say that a political decision is itself irreversible or a historical inevitability is to return once more to the Marxist belief structure that created multi-culturalism. Marxism fell and multi-culturalism will fall as we will cause it to fall.
-- Jim Union Against Multi-culty
"Abolish Multi-Culty and String Up The Traitors!"
