FauxPseudo
I do. Just not the hysterical popular press that more often than not colors the "news" more than reporting it.
The sub-head of the article you cited says: "CHICAGO, Illinois (AP) -- And another thing about McDonald's fries: They're not gluten-free." But they are. And later in the article they mention it.
Burger wars 2048In rec.food.cooking, Bob (this one) wrote the following -. You keep moving this goal post. I...
MSNBC provided essentially the same article, but headed it: "McDonald's fries contain allergens" And later in the article, contradict themselves.
Take a look at how the consuming public interprets the inaccuracies and compounds the hysteria:
Shoulda started there.
Burger wars 2049FauxPseudo No. It doesn't. It asks that the actual ingredients used be identified. So, as...
Couple things. Just because it comes from wheat doesn't mean it contains gluten, as the article explains. Likewise "derivatives" from milk and the allergenic components. The fact is that they've been telling the truth, as the article further says. There are no allergens in the products. "McDonald's director of global nutrition, Cathy Kapica, said its potato suppliers *remove all wheat and dairy proteins*, such as gluten, which can cause allergic reactions."
Some other perspectives:
This was a stupid move on their part. They did the clbuttic CYA move that almost always backfires: They said they were working on changing it and would try to do it quickly. No deadlines. But a decade is a bit much. I agree that they were at fault.
Peddle that someplace else. Disagreement is merely that.
Pastorio
