IME the issues with restaurant scrambled eggs have to do with them commonly cooking them over a griddle. This isn't IMHO a good idea. The griddle is too hot and furthermore has open sides. In addition they're "stirring" with a metal spatula, not with a spoon. The overall result is what I call "chopped omelette".
My way to do scrambled eggs is in a pot with high sides (which traps moisture) over medium-low heat and stirring with a spoon. You want to stir relatively frequently although not like a madman. So slower pace than for instance for custard.
Standing Rib Question 1620drop Every Christmas we do a standing rib roast. We're talking expensive beef here. This year's roast was $150.00 for 4 bones. Aged prime Angus beef. Worth every penny and a very rare treat. So...
Standing Rib Question 1621We do that on pot roast for the best flavor. Edwin is correct as a little research on my part has shown. I did find a reason...
I've also found that a regular (not non-stick) pot also works slightly better because butter or other fat tends to pool in a non-stick pot and inhibit good even cooking across the bottom. Furthermore it's difficult to get a good scraping action with a spoon without risking the finish on the pot no matter what, so non-stick is usually out for this application. Nonstick is better for omelettes - which again to some degree means that even in the home a lot of people are basically recreating chopped omelette when they try to make scrambled eggs.
-- Alex Rast (remove d., .7, not, and .NOSPAM to reply)
