It would probably be a whole lot more credible if your DOCTOR reported a case, which would then cause one to buttume that other possible explanations for ths illness had been considered and ruled out. Since you haven't bothered to do that, your report has no credibility. Hell, if I were DuPont, I'd ignore such a report, too.
OK, so find yourself an ambulance chaser who's willing to take on your case on a contingency basis. Become just one more example of our lawsuit-happy society...
Of course, any truly respectable attorney would require some actual evidence before proceeding too far with the case (see above), but I'm sure you can find one who's not so picky.
Teflon cooking is dangerous 7668When I first posted at 1am in the morning, I forgot to mention a few facts about my situation. No, I wasn't a hurricane evacuee, and no, there was...
Teflon's been around over 40 years. Is that the "statistic" you were looking for?
Yes, you clearly THINK that. Whether or not you actually have any evidence or reasoning to support that conclusion is another matter entirely.
Maybe - but guess what? Unless you're going to tell us now that you have the requisite knowledge in organic chemistry and-or medicine, I'm going to have to consider you as part of the "uneducated mbuttes" in this context. We've already had people who DO understand those subjects tell us that you're basically completely and utterly wrong.
Bob M.
