On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 09:21:46 +0100, The Reid wrote
Actually I was quite restrained in the context of your last remark.
Not really. You asked for examples. You were given four which can easily be substantiated as being major health issues.
You chose to brush them all off as "exceptional cases" rather than at the very least doing some basic research.
The word "stupid" is quite a restrained way of describing that.
cheese 739Oxymel of Squill Here is an Italian recipe: Togliete la crosta alle fette di pan carre. Disponete su ogni fetta di pane una...
There's no obsession at all. If you don't like the exposure of realities because it doesn't suite you, that is your problem, and not mine.
I posted a set of well considered and logical arguments as to why this organisation is fundamentally broken and should be shut down.
It is perfectly possible to have private and mixed private and publicly funded healthcare. Other countries manage it perfectly adequately with organisations that are on a per-capita of population basis a lot smaller than the NHS.
cheese 740Oxymel of Squill stringy Here is an Italian recipe: Togliete la crosta alle fette di pan carre. Disponete su ogni fetta di pane una fetta di mozzarella di...
At no point did I say that the delivery organisations should be in private hands as the only alternative option, so the issue of privatisation does not arise. there is space for private for-profit, not for profit, charitable trusts, etc. etc. I was not specific about that.
I think that you mean that you don't like to have a rather blinkered vision challenged. that is something quite different.
