Chelsea's XI isn't much better than Man Utd's or Liverpool 3883


Your Ad Here

Your Ad Here

nutrimat

Rooney was more expensive than Essien plus Tiago's sale alone generated 7 million to slash off Essien's price tag while Man Utd sold no significant player in order to buy Rooney.

The annual salaries of Veron and Crespo combined ammount to 13 million, the year they spent in Italy allowed Chelsea to save this money and use in Del Horno's tranfer for 12 million just to give an example of smart management.

man utd sold veron so you could knock that off. djemba djmeba they got rid of too. still if you take the figures spent after sales too chelsea have still spent more in less time. man utd and aresnal havent spent as much in 2 or 3 seasons as chelsea did in that first transfer window

i have strong opinions about stuff doesnt mean im right, just what i believe in. now whats your point then?

Are you seriously comparing Tiago Mendes with Kleberson or Eric Djemba-Djemba?

Chelsea's XI isn't much better than Man Utd's or Liverpool 3884
Well. I don't follow Chelsea's or any other sides reported transfer interests that closely, but nevertheless your claim smacks...

AndrZ

-- If Everton were playing at the bottom of the garden, I'd pull the curtains." Bill Shankly Bill Shankly : "A lot of football success is in the mind. You must believe you are the best and then make sure that you are. In my time at Liverpool we always said we had the best two teams on Merseyside, Liverpool and Liverpool Reserves."

 


Your Ad Here


Liverpool & Australian Football from Newsgroups

The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Provider on the Internet


Football | Previous | Next

Chelsea's XI isn't much better than Man Utd's or Liverpool 3884 | Chelsea's XI isn't much better than Man Utd's or Liverpool 3882