On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 21:47:00 +0100, "Pope Pompous XVIII"
So you're still saying that uefa.com has got it wrong and pumparse.com has got it right?
regarding Liverpool being the 'reigning' European Champions, but that isn't the same as the year the title was won.
Example: In December 2005 a girl wins the Miss World competition. the record books will show her as Miss World 2005. She will be the 'reigning' Miss World for most of 2006 but that doesn't mean she's Miss World 2006 or even Miss World 2005-2006. She won it in 2005 so she's Miss World 2005. Liverpool won it in 2004-2005 so they're recorded as European Champions 2004-2005.
My Predictions 200607 334Sniffer-Dog Agreed but an upset IMO would not be a major shock if Liverpool has a slightly better start to the season and Chelsea is slightly...
Everton won the league in 1938-39 then WW2 started. The next championship was in 1946-47. We were 'reigning' champions throughout the whole WW2 period until a team won it in 1946-47. So with your stupid fcukwit logic we were League Champions 1939-1946, so that's what the record books will show, right? Wrong you thick cnut! They say Everton 1938-39 then a gap until 1946-47!
Now, once and for all will you fcuk off you thick, stupid, ignorant
Bernie The Bolt -- 'Blue shirts good, red shirts bad' - George Orwell
