Dear Ren & WTH... 1672Totally and utterly wrong. It is not subjective to say that a 38 game league is a better measure of a team's ability...
I've already answered this, as you your buttinine stupid self has pointed out in this very thread, for all to see.
What truly makes you a buffoon Le Dieu is that you obsess over and over and over about something that is totally subjective. Do you understand that neither answer can be actually wrong? LOL.
There are people who think an EPL title is less valuable than an ECL title. There are those who think the EPL title is more valuable than an ECL title. Your arguments to support one side or the other are simply expressive of you *opinion*.
Note how you fail to call the Champions' League by a respectful title, you simply refer to it as a 'knock out competition' and yet you refer to the Premier League by 'Premiership' as opposed to 'a league'. That's yet another clear indication of your inability to be objective about any subject whether the topic is subjective or not. This is why you're never worth holding a serious discussion with. You're a petty little f***ing man (with an apparent hygiene problem.)
Now, arguing it objectively you can say one of the two following:
(1)Which is the best measure of a team's ability (a)Winning the European Champions' League or (b)Winning the Premiership
(2)Which is the best measure of a team's ability (a)Winning a knockout competition or (b)Winning a league
You pick and I'll eviscerate you happily either way.
WTH