How Long 923Not desperate and sour. My pathological hatred for Chelsea has nothing to do with their...
absolute years - players and Mourinho lot But its the majority reason why Chelsea have become a success. It's what I've said for agges amonst other people.
power strange No I'd support a Mid table pool anyday to a pool that brought a team in 4 weaks because they have a "sugardaddy".
Se above.
other Of cousre there is. See below
How Long 922I am amazed that you are amazed. I never suggested there was no difference in Chelsea's spending and most others. There...
Never. Your powers of awareness amaze us all. The difference is most teams buy a couple of top name players a season and have to work the team into the mould the current manager wants to use. Whilst this is happening he has to go short until next season and the season after. Chelsea don't. Hell if 6 of their players broke their legs tomorrow and had to retire, Chelsea would just buy the next 6 best by offering silly money that is just irresistible to player and club. Now would Arsenal Manure pool or spurs be able to replace that amount of first teamers in one transfer window? No. Chelsea Do not need a long term plan. Other teams does. That's what I call "buying success"
Yes that's true. So other teams look at their next target, knowing the other club won't be sniffing around as they also have a budget. Chelsea can just buy the best players if they feel they could be a threat to them to neutralize that threat. I would take SWP as that example, hardly a big part player is he?
We have to live