WWWWWWWW
those without blinkers
it would, look at your sig, you're so unable to get over the fact that chelsea are winning winning winning that you utterly fail to see the reality of the situation under JM. he was defensive at Porto, so it continues. houllier was criticised for this strategy it's only right that JM is. Like wise Sam Allardyce to some extent,Mark Hughes,David Moyes AND Rafa Benitez. oh and that yak f***ing scandinavian gimp "Steve" ericcsson ;-)
no we had that wih houllier, the more scholared fans seemed to recognise it straight away. and as we know football is more strategic these days, however mourhino is making an art form of it when he should be scultping along the lines of wenger imo. don't get me wrong, i think some critisism of CFC-JM-RA is unfair or un warranted not least because i believe they have been entertaining, other that bating soft twats like you that IS my opinion, however for the money spent Chelsea COULD be miles more entertaining along the lines of the Arsenal football of late, Madrid, Liverpool circa 1980's etc.
and probably never will be ;-) there is an obligation to entertain(not least when you're top of the league and have spent 100's of millions in less than two years), however 3 points can easily wash over that need.
--
