Next year's forward lines, my prediction. 69


Your Ad Here

Your Ad Here

Great Game
Yes, and Tony Blair speaks the truth about Iraq. Yes, speculative. That's what it was. Because Gerrard hasn't scored many goals from range, has he? Let me quote from the...

JAB Huh? So you're saying that because you can prove 1 = x from the premise x = 1, that makes any proof that relies on a premise garbage? The entire field of physical sciences will disagree with you on that one.

Next year's forward lines, my prediction. 70
Sorry Timbo, I thought we were having an almost interesting discussion. When you get out of the...

I just happen to be a theoretical computer scientist. I have a pretty good idea about mathematical proof as I spend a good proportion of my job reading and writing them. I proved that with Le Dieu's agreed definition of 'easier', his buttertion that the CL is easier to win than the PL was wrong. He has even since said that he agrees with this. I didn't claim the PL was easier for every team, or any one particular team, just that Le Dieu's statement was wrong. Can you find fault in the proof? If not, then stop going on about it. I think now that maybe your beef is with the buttumption that 'easier' is related to probability (and I do think that is about as good as you can get to a definition of 'easier'), but it was the definition that Le Dieu was using when he made the statement, so it was a correct buttumption. This was the reason I asked him to agree on it before I did anything else.

What avoiding? I completely agree that Liverpool had a better chance in the CL this year than winning the league. But one team's chance of winning the CL has no relation to Le Dieu's original statement.

 


Your Ad Here


Liverpool & Australian Football from Newsgroups

The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Provider on the Internet


Football | Previous | Next

Next year's forward lines, my prediction. 70 | Next year's forward lines, my prediction. 68