Simon
Yes, of course I see the difference, but you are missing my point. We would have to define "SICK" precisely so it can be introduced into a court of law. There is no definition of the word "SICK" in a court room. And then jurors would need to understand it so they can decide whether or not the prisoner did something sick, so their punishment can be handed out.
REDS KOP STELIOSSTELIOS will sign for Liverpool this week in a 1 million move which will leave Bolton furious. The Greek Euro 2004 winner is poised to become Rafael Benitez's latest...
What if he whacked the person around the head with something heavy? Surely he would be aware that could kill the person, so therefore it's liquidate. Is that sick? Now, consider that the victim is a female. Is that sick? You clearly think that the liquidate in Huyton was sick, but that could have been done in the heat of the moment, so those responsible people be spared your idea of justice?
When people go around a newsgroup shouting poo about victims of rape asking for it, I will then debate with them. But seeing that this is not happening on this thread, I haven't been. I don't see you going around this newsgroup denouncing Robert Mugabe. Should I infer then, that you support what he is doing in Zimbabwe? Of course not.
Because he is SICK. What happens when he needs to shower, see psychologists-doctors, go to court, etc?
