an yes its good enough for you
most people feel sorry for yo and wont point it out. i'd rather spend all day talking to diablos rojos then you, again someone else who shows a little intelligence. he can wire a light you know
More transfer probeslapsed-sb-5-o-all-fpart-1 As a result of the investigation into Djibril Cisse's £14million transfer from Auxerre to Liverpool, other...
no i was on about the first link you posted.
is, no the un inspectors didnt get full co operation before the war, they checked it over after the war. fact
they they? yeah sites he had been willing to disclose. there could of been other information that a scientist could of been willing to disclose, which he would never dare with suddamns men behind him listening to him. what that info could, might of been no one will never know. it could of been other sites that had evidence od wmd in progress, or documents on possible future sales of wmd's to iraq.
imagine if one scientist had that info, but couldnt disclose it, that would put a whole different complexion on things wouldnt it?
in
no complying was letting them in of the first time of asking. complying was they was supposed to interview people without suddam's men their too.
though 100000+ yes and some of that total was suddams men not caring if they hit civillians, they even dressed up like them and fought in the middle of groups of their own people, so dont put the whole figure on blair-bush
jab are where is your evidence of anything you mention? where is the evidence that 9-11 was the US goverments act? the hard evidence i mean not someone claiming that the building fell down in 7 seconds hence it couldnt of been the plane.
WHOOOOOOSH!, i take it you dont do sarcasm. you could do a great yank impression. admit you was had on that one LOL
"Stories like this have been coming out of Fallujah for days" stories from iraqis who hate the americans? actualy stories say it all, hearsay what ever you want to call it, no hard evidence. or "Aid organizations like the Red Cross and the Red Crescent were barred from entering the city to distribute food and medical supplies" sounds bad that one, did they forget to mention that they were barred for their own safety? yes it doesnt sound as bad with that line. thats called journalism, something you reckon we shouldnt follow as they as they the media full of journilists patch these stories up to make it sound better or sell papers etc.
no i wouldnt trust one, but i wouldnt discredit them with out giving it a think over first. you obviously would.
now so so if blair said something that was truthful you wouldnt believe him on principle, that sounds good LOL your funny, ever thought of russian roulette? please be my guest, bet if i phoned you why you was ironing you'd burn your face!
suit. no i have read lots and lots and choose to believe what i do. its you who claims im ignorant because i choose not to believe the version you believe in. again on that principle, does that make you a stupid ignorant prick because you dont believe the version i believe in?
anyone for and what happened if someone proved beyond a doubt it wasnt to do with oil? would you then say they (as in the people who claim it was about oil) was wrong? no you'd ignore that wouldnt you?
they what should of i said? my work colleauge? my boss? my second cousin removed third replaces and spun around whilst blindfolded?
power ask suddam, ask hitler.
should wrong someone probably funded harold shipmans doctor degree, are they just as guilty?
it, men fully and the fact is there could of been other sites that no one could of told them because suddam had his men sit in the interviews, i know i wouldnt drop suddam in it he was going to find out it was me.
scenario will of yes but it could of took more that checking the listed sites, it might of needed one of these iraqis to talk, we will never know because they had a gu n to there head if you like
un, yes we broke the un rules, because the un wouldnt act on suddam when he clearly broke the rules that stated this could happen if he did. the un is too scared of upseting their members nowadays. its all too much red tape and politics in the un, something they alledgy dont do.
GERRARD IN RUNNING FOR WORLD AWARDPaul Eaton 13 October 2005 Steven Gerrard is in the running to be named World Player of the Year after FIFA announced their shortlist today. The Liverpool captain was named European football's...
like a doing right, until they got involved with politics side of things and its all downhill from there
was a and i'm saying he could of gained them in the context of a theory of he was getting away with non compliance to the un time and time again
black the so suddamn never signed up to any resoloutions? he signed he would comply in exchange for unrestricted trading.
one why not? get real? yes i dont believe in crop circles, but less me guess you have read otherwise! . that, link?
like right lets try this again you wrote "We used mustard gas in the trenches of WWI, pot kettle a funny colour" and i'm saying because we have done something wrong in the past means we shouldnt criticise others for it? if so. why the f*** did we oppose hitler invading anywhere, when in fact we had done the same in our history.
maybe you should of paid attention the first time.
