Ok , good point, but who cheated?
The drunk bloke didn't see he had the flush, I did, and although no one said anything Imp sure the other guys saw it too. It was a moment of " is anyone going to say anything or what??"
So I think about this and feel "yes" I should have probably said something, but if the piss head didn't see it in the first place then in my opinion , it's his fault. He called the Nines, that was the hand that he called regardless of the flush that he did actually have. We all saw the trip kings the pot leader had. So maybe it was that no one saw it but me. I was out of the hand, so , in fair competition, should I be the one influencing two opponents who were actually , at that point, a lot further ahead in the game than me.
Wouldn't that be like having Benitez talk to a referee after we have scored a goal and say" don't allow that ref, we were off side"? Who stands to win the argument?
Thus the moral dilemma bugs me still.
They are a nice bunch of guys and all friends, but a games a game and a good night is a good night and winning the money is just a bonus to us lot.
Kev.H.
