Obviously you've not given up; ergo, I'll continue to educate you.
You very obviously fail to understand the basic course of events of this 'argument' as it unfolded.
(1)OP posts that boxing is the most demanding sport. (2)I post that boxing is not the most demanding sport and provide a specific triathalon as an example because he was talking about boxing Mohammed Ali. (3)You jump in and buttert that my buttertion is incorrect because you can 'iron man' (interpreted to mean you have the requisite SKILLS to enter a triathalon.) (4)We post several times over the course of which you claim first that a triathalon (the iron man in particular) IS NOT more physically demanding than its equivalency in a boxing match, then your tune is that boxing is more demanding because you can get pummeled sic unconcious or to rest. After being shown how ridiculous that statement was, you change your tune yet again to the nonsensical "Iron man is an event geared towards people who have trained to that level. Same as a title fight" which does not support your argument (I presume you're still attempting to support your original argument at this point) that an ironman is not more physically demanding than a heavyweight title fight. Then you acknowledge what I stated in my original post, that there are sports more demanding than boxing, ergo removing the need for all of your previous posts; however, your pedantry begins.
Skipping the synopsis of your past two posts, here we are. You "giving up" and then continuing.
WTH
OTish The greatest sportsman of all time 4363Is it just me, or is 12 not 10? Sampras never even won all 4 major championships in his career, never mind in 1 season, so surely Maureen Connelly, Steffi Graf et al rank higher...