LOL
Those links are the original ones from Moog dated 18th and 19th where I accuse you of copying. Why can't you see, for example, article 30 from my link, where chalk is clearly mentioned. Heheh, in article 28 I was slagging you for copying me on something else; you were in a real state mentally then Bern, remember? You still haven't recovered from the battering, hence your poodle-like status now trying depserately to score one point from me...but this is the lamest of the lame.
Made you look a thick twat (c) again, so chalk another one up (c) for Ted. Clbuttic!! (c) Looks like I've run you ragged (c) so much again Bern, you don't know what you're doing (c). Ever think you'll get one over on me Bern thePoodle (c)? Nah, didn't think so.
LOL!!!
I think this debate is well and truly over now. Lucky for you I have some time away so now NG for me... but at least I can go with the sweet scent of another Bolt humiliation in my nostrils, and a Moog so demoralised I doubt he'll be back after making such a fool of himself.
Another (2) Bluepooes made to look thick twats - chalk it up !!!!!!!!!!! BWAHAHAAHAHAHA.
See ya girls
Offensive 765On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 00:49:29 -0000, "w w w w w w(18 & 5-)" Well I'm sorry Ted but I've looked and I've looked again but the phrase that you've been arguing...