Phil Neville unconvinced by United

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:04:26 GMT, Dave G wrote in alt.sports.soccer.everton:

You know that wasn't what I meant. Stop being so pedantic.

Agreed. However, in the great scheme of things, some fixtures are far harder than others. OK, this may all be "on paper" but you know what I mean, surely.

No. You *dismissed* by claiming it as "BS Slant". This isn't a disagreement. This isn't a dscussion. It is a rude dismissal with little other to base it on than the fact that I support another team from you.

Jesus Egg that wept.

WTF? What are you talking about? How did I buttess the LFC squad with a "raving BS bias"? Show me.

Did you now? I saw you flying off the handle and dismissing my POV by claiming it as a "BS Slant".

In which case, can we just dismiss your entire existence as being worth nothing because you have a Kopite Slant? Nope. I don't think so

Of course I have. Fuxake. You seem to have got all your facts mixed up. The editorial states that Phil Neville sees Liverpool as Chelsea's main adversories. A point I agreed upon and I then went on to give my opinion of why.

Yet you bring your partisan attitude into it.

It's a case of he read what was said and responded in an informed and adult way. Perhaps you should learn from him.

He questions his tactical awareness. Something I've also done in the past. Still, you carry on seeing everything in the DaveG way eh?

Your ridiculous "BS Slant" comment just about sums you up. There's very few examples of you having genuine discussions with another teams supporters. In fact, so few I commented on one last week when you did just that. It was a shock you see.

-- Moog

"I once had a large gay following, but I ducked into an alleyway and lost him."