Taxi for Crouch! 751

On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 09:51:22 GMT, Dave G wrote in alt.sports.soccer.everton:

He does a job. Crouch is technically a better footballer, but lacks the "person" instinct IMHO.

Scott Parker is awful. Alonso cannot play with Gerrard as far as I can tell and Garcia is a f***ing homoloveual. ;-)

I think he's looked dire since he signed.

Indeed. Yet one goal?

A decent Keeper. But then again, so is Dudek, Kirkland et al....

Hmmmm. I'm actually quite pleased we didn't get him. He looks like he loses his head too easily.

Zenden is dreadful IMO. He is wasteful. But I suppose he's getting into positions to be wasteful from.

hmmm. Not so bad. I disagree.

I didn't want him to sign. I really didn't. But he's proved me wrong in the last three home games I've seen him play in.

Who signed him? Was it RB or GH?

That's *exactly* when RB's transfer dealings will be in the public eye. Another Pellegrini and you will suffer. A decent signing and you won't.

I completely agree.

WBA struck lucky. Our heads fell after that awful penalty decision.

Perhaps. They *all* make mistakes at one time or another.

He was criticised. But not overly no.

I still think some of the comments were a little out of order. However, I could understand why they were making their statements.

I couldn't agree more. How the f*** did we finish 4th last season? Graft and desire....that was it.

If that's the case, you'll do well.

Of that there is no doubt.

Yup. For instance, Pat Van Den Heuwe was never a world clbutt footballer. But f*** me, we couldn't have shown what we did with out him.

Pat Van den Heuwe returns? ;-)

I just knew it wouldn't last. When are you going to throw the racism card in? ;-)

-- Moog

"I once had a large gay following, but I ducked into an alleyway and lost him."