new X5 873I'll future. No the mix up is because of various things. Rover doesn't exist as such any more. Second - Rover is used to refer to what is now (sort of) MG...
How old are you, seriously? You've got the rhetorical ability of a poorly educated teenager.
Either you can admit your analogy is ridiculously poor or not, otherwise I can't help you. Rather than admit the extremely hyperbolic stupidity of your analogy, you prefer to focus on the purpose of the analogy itself which, ironically, I did not dispute. Maybe you should simply take a deep breath and realize that I did not refute your analogy because I don't think engine displacement should be clbutted. LOL.
That depends on the sports car. What 4 cylinder 2000cc sports car were you referring to?
If you're referring to some piece of poo "sporty" car against a V12 ferrari, you're quite obviously talking about two VERY different ends of the car spectrum. Quite obviously not the case regarding the SUVs in question.
You'll also note (or utterly fail to more likely), that I quite clearly referred to the fact that we have been discussing "Performance SUVs", that's hardly just clbuttifying them as "SUV's" sic as you attempt to buttert above.
Christ, you're terrible at this. Are you Le Dieu in disguise?
WTH
-- "If Everton were playing at the bottom of the garden, I'd pull the curtains." - Bill Shankly
